Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Technical Questions #12108
Sound like QCCO.
Thank you for the response!
Probably, the lack of liquidity
alters traditional charting,
what do you think?I would call
your definition of flatlining:
Ultra FlatliningI use “flatlining”
to refer to what
the Bowser crew
used the phrase “stale”,
to describe.not much news
not much buying
not much selling
not much volume
not much movement
(maybe a few months)What would that be called?
(that isn’t necessarily
reflective of the
fundamental business)What is the difference
between a pennant
and a wedge.seem like the same shape to me
I had to look up MJ.
That should tell you
something:I thought MaJor stocks.
Well yes large cap stocks
are Robo traded.Milli Joules
Michael Jackson
Michael Jordanoh, now I know
did you notice that the former Chief Financial Officer of US Auto Parts has joined Hightime and spoke glowingly of whatever it is
apparently a long-standing
cannabis operationit would be nice if he would refuse his salary for the next 12 months, considering the circumstances of US Auto Parts, if he’s found another nice job
the executive changes at
US Auto Parts are for the best“thanks for keeping cool”
I can say strange things.
But beware: I am 100% sober.
Devouringly sober.
With all that whirl
of global rotation,
could we possibly
have a few more
independent minded
investors (like
you) yielding a
bit more liquidity
in Bowser stocks?ARC Documents would
love the government
of China to let them
have their $10 million,
that they could it profit
from investing globally, too.Well these things take time.
And do certainly require
pressure. That pressure is
unpleasant. However, the
pleasantness of the absence
of that pressure is not goodness;
it is irresponsibility.(I’m going to get deleted again.)
Seriously, what are crypto coins.
Thanks for the heads up.
It meant a lot to me.A terrific quarter.
How can they do this?They make it work.
(Previously, I avoided NROM:
like avoiding getting up
too early, to go to work.)I wonder if a tendency
could occur, where
investors choose stocks
that appear more distanced
from international trade
concerns.Food stocks, for instance.
in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12100Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Inventories (Third Component):
Finished Goods (net):
Normalcy Ranking Scale:
(Composed of the
last thirteen quarters:
2/29/2016 to 2/28/2019)
_____________________(+13)
(+12) 2,283,439 (02/2019)
(+11)
(+10) 2,209,553 (11/2018)
(+09)
(+08) 2,033,293 (08/2018)
(+07)
(+06) 1,904,773 (05/2018)
(+05)
(+04) 1,750,711 (02/2018)
(+03)
(+02) 1,685,616 (02/29/2016)
(+01)
(=00) 1,637,458 (05/2016)
(-01)
(-02) 1,624,541 (11/2017)
(-03)
(-04) 1,614,729 (11/2016)
(-05)
(-06) 1,562,133 (08/2016)
(-07)
(-08) 1,493,477 (05/2017)
(-09)
(-10) 1,440,384 (02/2017)
(-11)
(-12) 1,392,930 (08/2017)
(-13)
_____________________(In a post above
of May 18th, 2019,
there are a few
explanatory notes.)in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12097Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Accounts Payable:
Normalcy Ranking Scale:
(Composed of the
last thirteen quarters:
2/29/2016 to 2/28/2019)
_________________________+13:
+12: 1,201,098 :(11/2017)
+11:
+10: 1,159,569 :(11/2018)
+09:
+08: 1,101,066 :(05/2017)
+07:
+06: 1,055,690 :(08/2017)
+05:
+04: 1,024,256 :(05/2018)
+03:
+02: 1,008,211 :(08/2018)
+01:
=00: 0,977,436 :(02/2019)
-01:
-02: 0,877,167 :(05/2016)
-03:
-04: 0,842,976 :(02/2018)
-05:
-06: 0,816,532 :(02/2017)
-07:
-08: 0,710,320 :(08/2016)
-09:
-10: 0,642,648 :(02/2016)
-11:
-12: 0,486,963 :(11/2016)
-13:
_________________________(In the post above,
of May 18th, 2019,
there are a few
explanatory notes.)in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12094Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Accounts Receivable (net):
Normalcy Ranking Scale:
(Composed of the
last thirteen quarters:
2/29/16 to 2/28/19)
_________________________+13:
+12: 2,344,373
+11:
+10: 2,274,729
+09:
+08: 2,184,906
+07:
+06: 2,150,655
+05:
+04: 2,099,082
+03:
+02: 2,086,706
+01:
=00: 2,086,015
-01:
-02: 2,078,116
-03:
-04: 2,047,032
-05:
-06: 1,984,806
-07:
-08: 1,916,893
-09:
-10: 1,871,737
-11:
-12: 1,825,101
-13:
_________________________(In the post above,
of May 18, 2019,
there are a few
explanatory notes.)in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12092Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Cash, and Cash Equivalents:
Normalcy Ranking Scale:
(Composed of the
last thirteen quarters:
2/29/16 to 2/28/19)
_________________________+13:
+12: 2,053,181
+11:
+10: 1,985,928
+09:
+08: 1,742,786
+07:
+06: 1,299,886
+05:
+04: 1,168,930
+03:
+02: 1,135,365
+01:
=00: 1,002,158
-01:
-02: 0,988,686
-03:
-04: 0,867,607
-05:
-06: 0,586,986
-07:
-08: 0,543,207
-09:
-10: 0,529,363
-11:
-12: 0,481,831
-13:
_________________________When the quarterly figure
for “Cash, and Cash Equivalents”
for the quarter ending 5/31/19
becomes available,this scale will help
to gauge it’s normalcy rank.It will be either
a positive odd number,
or a negative odd number.The closer to zero,
the closer to normalcy.For the date of each value,
and it’s chronological sequence,
see “Cash, and Cash Equivalents”,
several posts earlier (above).This is a ranking scale,
not a scale of numerical
proportion.in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12089Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Inventories (Consolidated):
Raw Materials (net)
Work-In-Progress (net)
Finished Goods (net)Quarterly Figures:
Beginning with the Leap Day
of the Leap Year of 2016:
______________________________$ 4 , 774 , 992 : (02/29/2016)
$ 4 , 727 , 977 : (05/31/2016)
$ 4 , 625 , 843 : (08/31/2016)
$ 4 , 465 , 801 : (11/30/2016)
______________________________$ 4 , 342 , 217 : (02/28/2017)
$ 4 , 204 , 723 : (05/31/2017)
$ 4 , 544 , 943 : (08/31/2017)
$ 4 , 792 , 085 : (11/30/2017)
______________________________$ 5 , 449 , 808 : (02/28/2018)
$ 5 , 710 , 888 : (05/31/2018)
$ 6 , 134 , 627 : (08/31/2018)
$ 6 , 077 , 054 : (11/30/2018)
______________________________$ 5 , 751 , 164 : (02/28/2019)
in reply to: Mikros Systems Corporation (MRKS) #12085SYMBOL: M K R S
Just on the surface (which is
to say I don’t know anything),weakness in the stock of
Mikros (if it is weakness
in the particular stock,
and not just a general
increase in trading discount,
on riskier issues, in a more volatile market) may be caused
by the waning enthusiasm for Littoral Combat Ship production
(that Mikros has business with).On the other hand, now, there is
talk of extending the service
of AEGIS Cruisers and destroyers
(that Mikros has business with).The older ships are criticized
for not playing a role in
ultimate combat circumstances
of ultra modern technologies.And nature criticizes those critics
by providing a great amount
of unultimate circumstances
to deal with.Anyway, there is probably
more value for Mikros in
the new installations on the
Littoral Combat Ships, than
in maintenance and training.I can see the stock trading
between 10¢ and 50¢ per share
(a capitalization between
3.5 and 17.5 million dollars).The interest maker being
their technological expertise,
to come up with something
in government or industry.If they need to refinance,
maybe people will throw it away,
maybe it will drop to 10¢,
maybe they will reverse split,
maybe they will refinance,
maybe, it will make it to
pre-split 100¢. Not too bad.in reply to: Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT) #12080Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)
Inventories (First Component):
Raw Materials (net):
Quarterly Figures:
Beginning with the Leap Day
of the Leap Year of 2016:
______________________________$ 2 , 058 , 153 : (02/29/2016)
$ 2 , 030 , 655 : (05/31/2016)
$ 1 , 988 , 616 : (08/31/2016)
$ 1 , 855 , 948 : (11/30/2016)
______________________________$ 1 , 955 , 787 : (02/28/2017)
$ 1 , 773 , 368 : (05/31/2017)
$ 2 , 112 , 384 : (08/31/2017)
$ 2 , 050 , 894 : (11/30/2017)
______________________________$ 2 , 514 , 357 : (02/28/2018)
$ 2 , 796 , 691 : (05/31/2018)
$ 2 , 806 , 360 : (08/31/2018)
$ 2 , 822 , 375 : (11/30/2018)
______________________________$ 2 , 411 , 474 : (02/28/2019)
in reply to: #12077Correction: according to the
Acey Deusey modifications,
Dynasil would have no
superscript, unless it fell
below $1:THEN it would be -1
(I tried to make it positivistic,
mostly rewarding the OTCs,
rather than hanging a negativity
on many stocks trading below $2.)in reply to: #12076According to the
May 2019 Bowser Report,
Dynasil trades on the
NASDAQ Capital Market
(Nasdaq Small Cap Market)In the past, that exchange
freely allowed trading
below one dollar.Does anyone know whether
that is still the case?The question of price
requirements, looms large
over penny stock investors.If the NASDAQ Small-Cap
now has a $1 minimum,
then the Acey Deusey
rating modification
would be:superscript -2
11^-2
(I am not able to make
a superscript -2
on my cell phone.)in reply to: Microsoft Systems Corporation (MKRS) #12073I did not write that!
The machine did it.
(my cellphone, probably)there’s always humor
the joke’s on me
_________________________
M i c r o s
S y s t e m s
C o r p o r a t i o n
( M K R S )
in reply to: #12071According to my proposed
Acey Deusey rating system,
Dynasil’s rating would get
a superscript +1. (Maybe it
is not a good idea.)The original post was motivated
because Dynasil’s stock activity
did not make sense to me
(whatever that means (nonsense)),
and I thought somebody might say something.If the stock doesn’t
need to be above one dollar,
the trading seems queer.Well, every stock: it’s business,
it’s customers, it’s investors,
and even in it’s charts and
trading patterns; has it’s own
personality.If one stock does not agree
with a person in some way,
that person may move on.We are fortunate to have
such an overflowing variety
of alternative opportunities. -
AuthorPosts
