Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 185 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    One votes
    against all nominees,
    by selling the stock.

    Anything else
    would be silly.

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    I think the new management
    has it right. The value of
    US Auto Parts will be in
    being an independent retailer.

    Those third party marketplaces
    (perhaps like the previous
    management), are not interested
    in excellence (or retailing,
    as far as I’m concerned).
    (They are just a monopolized
    blob.)

    And yes, they need the Nevada
    warehouse, because retail
    SHIPPING expectations have
    become extraordinary (the
    SHIPPING, not the RETAILING).

    Whether they have the financial
    strength, to weather the storm
    they are nearly flounder into
    by difficult circumstances,
    is, of course, the question
    of prospective investment.

    However, with the Nasdaq
    down 3 1/2 % today, and
    PRTS up 1 %, and in view
    of the past few months
    of trading, it is as
    possible as it can be
    to say, from my inexpert
    peanut galleried station:
    the selling is over.

    This stock has pocketed
    support here.

    (These things mentioned
    just casually in passing.
    I am not deeply involved
    with the stock. Just a
    bit of bottom fishing.)

    The Day’s Trading:

    Price: 95¢ to 98¢

    Volume: 99,860 shares

    Close: 98¢ (up 1¢)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)

    Inventories (Second Component):

    Work-In-Progress (net):

    Quarterly Figures:

    Beginning with the Leap Day
    of the Leap Year of 2016:
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 031 , 223 : (02/29/2016)

    $ 1 , 059 , 864 : (05/31/2016)

    $ 1 , 075 , 094 : (08/31/2016)

    $ 0 , 995 , 124 : (11/30/2016)
    ______________________________

    $ 0 , 946 , 046 : (02/28/2017)

    $ 0 , 937 , 878 : (05/31/2017)

    $ 1 , 039 , 629 : (08/31/2017)

    $ 1 , 116 , 650 : (11/30/2017)
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 184 , 740 : (02/28/2018)

    $ 1 , 009 , 424 : (05/31/2018)

    $ 1 , 294 , 974 : (08/31/2018)

    $ 1 , 045 , 126 : (11/30/2018)
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 056 , 251 : (02/28/2019)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    I happened to be curious about
    these figures.

    They do not seem to be readily
    available. It was necessary
    to go through each quarterly
    report to assemble them.

    And, as they do not seem to be
    readily available, I share
    them here, as unique content.

    The greatest significance
    of which, is it’s insignificance.

    To be less fancy:

    when the next quarterly report
    comes out, it will be possible
    to inspect each of these
    categorys’ (categories’)
    latest figure,

    and quickly recognize (recognise),
    whether or not they are
    within the range
    of the previous set:

    the range of normalcy.

    If they do remain
    within normalcy,
    as I would expect,

    the added clarity
    allows more weight
    to be given

    to the incidence of
    any improvement in the
    more red blooded figures,
    significant to the Bowser
    Report’s recommendation
    of Schmitt Industries.

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)

    Inventories (Third Component):

    Finished Goods (net):

    Quarterly Figures:

    Beginning with the Leap Day
    of the Leap Year of 2016:
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 685 , 616 : (02/29/2016)

    $ 1 , 637 , 458 : (05/31/2016)

    $ 1 , 562 , 133 : (08/31/2016)

    $ 1 , 614 , 729 : (11/30/2016)
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 440 , 384 : (02/28/2017)

    $ 1 , 493 , 477 : (05/31/2017)

    $ 1 , 392 , 930 : (08/31/2017)

    $ 1 , 624 , 541 : (11/30/2017)
    ______________________________

    $ 1 , 750 , 711 : (02/28/2018)

    $ 1 , 904 , 773 : (05/31/2018)

    $ 2 , 033 , 293 : (08/31/2018)

    $ 2 , 209 , 553 : (11/30/2018)
    ______________________________

    $ 2 , 283 , 439 : (02/28/2019)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)

    Accounts Payable:

    Quarterly Figures:

    Beginning with the Leap Day
    of the Leap Year of 2016:
    ________________________

    $ 0,642,648 (02/29/2016)

    $ 0,877,167 (05/31/2016)

    $ 0,710,320 (08/31/2016)

    $ 0,486,963 (11/30/2016)
    ________________________

    $ 0,816,532 (02/28/2017)

    $ 1,101,066 (05/31/2017)

    $ 1,055,690 (08/31/2017)

    $ 1,201,098 (11/30/2017)
    ________________________

    $ 0,842,976 (02/28/2018)

    $ 1,024,256 (05/31/2018)

    $ 1,008,211 (08/31/2018)

    $ 1,159,569 (11/30/2018)
    ________________________

    $ 0,977,436 (02/28/2019)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Duel In Carson City

    It must have been a
    sight to behold, watching
    the bulls and bears dual it out
    around 94¢.

    I tuned in periodically,
    waiting for break down.

    Instead, it was like
    watching two central banks
    play stale mate.

    The bulls won the day,
    though. This day, at least.
    Closing at 97¢.

    The stock seems to have
    good support in this range.

    Trading Activity Today:

    Price: 92¢ to 97¢

    Volume: 332,461 shares

    Anyone have any comments
    on the recent presentation?

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)

    Accounts Receivable (net):

    Quarterly Figures:

    Beginning with the Leap Day
    of the Leap Year of 2016:
    __________________________

    $ 1,984,806 : (02/29/2016)

    $ 2,099,082 : (05/31/2016)

    $ 1,916,893 : (08/31/2016)

    $ 1,825,101 : (11/30/2016)
    __________________________

    $ 2,274,729 : (02/28/2017)

    $ 2,344,373 : (05/31/2017)

    $ 2,086,015 : (08/31/2017)

    $ 2,150,655 : (11/30/2017)
    __________________________

    $ 2,086,706 : (02/28/2018)

    $ 2,047,032 : (05/31/2018)

    $ 1,871,737 : (08/31/2018)

    $ 2,184,906 : (11/30/2018)
    __________________________

    $ 2,078,116 : (02/28/2019)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries, Inc. (SMIT)

    Cash, and Cash Equivalents:

    Quarterly Figures:

    Beginning with the Leap Day
    of the Leap Year of 2016:
    ________________________

    $ 1,135,365 : 02/29/2016

    $ 0,988,686 : 05/31/2016

    $ 1,002,158 : 08/31/2016

    $ 0,543,207 : 11/30/2016
    ________________________

    $ 0,481,831 : 02/28/2017

    $ 0,867,607 : 05/31/2017

    $ 0,529,363 : 08/31/2017

    $ 0,586,986 : 11/30/2017
    ________________________

    $ 1,985,928 : 02/28/2018

    $ 2,053,181 : 05/31/2018

    $ 1,742,786 : 08/31/2018

    $ 1,299,886 : 11/30/2018
    ________________________

    $ 1,168,930 : 02/28/2019

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    It was interesting to
    notice, casually, that
    CFRA placed a buy rating
    on PRTS: even with losses
    projected for 2019 & 2020.

    The report dates
    from April 29, 2019.

    (CFRA: Center For Financial
    Research & Analysis LLC)

    (CFRA has nothing to do with
    CF Bank, or Central Federal
    Corporation (CFBK).)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251
    in reply to: #12030

    I see an article 4 days ago, Link below. They are going to buy out?

    Dynasil Corporation of America’s Board of Directors Approves Plan to Terminate Registration of Its Common Stock

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251

    Schmitt Industries has
    an unusual Fiscal Year:

    June 1st to May 31st
    ______________________

    making their quarters:

    Quater I:

    June 1st to August 31st

    Quarter II:

    September 1st to November 31st

    Quarter III:

    December 1st to February 28th

    or

    December 1st to February 29th

    Quarter IIII:

    March 1st to May 31st
    ___________________________

    There is still the problem
    of WHICH fiscal year it is.

    Therefore, to avoid confusion,
    instead of saying: Fiscal 2019,
    they use phrases like: the fiscal
    year ending May 31st of 2019.

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251
    in reply to: CFBK #12010

    The significance of
    the efficiency ratio
    for Central Federal Corporation

    would seem to me to be that,
    with all the growth,
    it not only did not deteriorate
    or stay the same,
    it actually improved 2 1/2 % !
    _______________________________

    (if I got the math right)

    75.99 % (2017) – 74.13 % (2018)

    = 1.86 percentage point difference

    1.86 ÷ 75.99 = 0.0244769 (2 1/2 %)
    __________________________________

    Even with all the growth,
    the efficiency ratio
    still improved (decreased)
    2.5%, from 2017 to 2018.

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251
    in reply to: CFBK #12009

    http://www.bankreg.com/all1Emet.asp?met=EFF

    (copied and inputted by
    cell phone single finger,
    no guarantee of exactitude)

    (I like the Bowser font
    distinction: “1” & “l” :
    regarding the address:
    not sure if “all1” or “a11l”)

    ________________________________

    Bank Efficiency Ratios By Assets

    $250 – 499,000,000 assets:

    68.17 %

    $500 – 999,000,000 assets:

    63.45 %

    Crudely:
    from Micro Bank to Mega Bank
    the efficiency ratios go
    from 75% to 50%

    This is probably for the
    banks themselves, and not
    the holding companies.
    ______________________________

    http://www.usbanklocations/bank-rank/efficiency-ratio—performanceratios–pcr-eeffr.html

    from the site above:

    C F B a n k itself is ranked:

    #2492 at 68.3040 % for 2018

    I think the name is: CFBank
    (no spaces), BankLocations
    lists it as CF Bank
    (a space between F and B)

    Former Subscriber
    Member
    Post count: 251
    in reply to: CFBK #12005

    C F B a n k (CFBK)

    (Central Federal Corporation)

    Non-performing Loans

    as a percentage of total loans:

    2014 : 0.59 %

    2015 : 0.47 %

    2016 : 0.20 %

    2017 : 0.11 %

    2018 : 0.07 %

    “Non-performing loans consist of
    non-accrual loans and other loans
    90 days or more past due.”

    ______________________________

    A non-accrual loan,
    is a loan, the payments
    of which, are not to be
    entered into the ledger,
    until they are physically
    received, because, for
    whatever reason, it has
    been decided to wait for
    physical delivery.

    Non Performing Loan Status:

    Strike One

    Impaired Loan Status:

    Strike Two

    (I am not an accountant.)

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 185 total)