Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: The Singing Machine Co. (SMDM) #12343
On page 4 of
the April 2019
Bowser Report,the month of the recommendation
of ARC Document Solutions (ARC),ARC is listed as having
Long Term Debt
of $ 74,195,000.On page 4 of
the July 2019
Bowser Report,ARC is listed as having
Long Term Debt
of $ 139,019,000.Any comments?
in reply to: The Singing Machine Co. (SMDM) #12340ARC Document Solutions, Inc. (ARC)
surprised to see ARC
hit a new 52-week low, today
(if I’m not mistaken): 176¢no big deal really because
it’s been trading in that areaya know, it’s always possible
that there is some confusion
with:ARC Group Worldwide, Inc. (ARCW)
ARC Group Worldwide is
delisting from the NASDAQ.The NASDAQ would not permit
ARC Document Solutions to
delist from the NASDAQ,because ARC Document Solutions
is not listed on the NASDAQ.ARC Group Worldwide
plans to list on the Pink Sheets.ARC Document Solutions
probably plans to continue
listing on the NYSE.in reply to: The Singing Machine Co. (SMDM) #12336It seems the 52-week low
was always $1.60-something,now, the 52-week low is $1.78.
(who else but me would wait
for a dollar twenty-five)(it’s easy to wait,
when you can’t afford more)Anyway, doesn’t it suggest,
thereby, that there is
an increasing interest
in acquiring the stock?(on the subject of
rising 52-week lows)in reply to: The Singing Machine Co. (SMDM) #14598ARC Document Solutions, Inc. (ARC)
I think it had some
unusual action today:volume up today, traded over
a quarter million sharesday’s range: $1.82 to $1.96
closed up 8¢ to 195¢
not sure what it means
(i thought: it would have
been nice to have bought
1,000 shares at 183¢, and
sold them at 193¢)i’ve never been involved
in ARC, however, it has
a nice name and tickerand i glance at it
from time to timein reply to: The Bowser Forum #12315Perhaps there could be
a forum division
for warrants:The Warrant Forum
Build it, and maybe
they will come.On the other hand
maybe that is not wanted.I guess that could all go in
The Dungeon.Still, if people see
a labeled directory,
they might feel invited
to make discussion
on the topic.in reply to: The Bowser Forum #14596Well, actually, in accordance with
the lightness of forum activity,
changes do not seem to be
necessary.In fact, I don’t think it would
be much missed, if it were
deleted.It’s nice that it’s here.
It’s fine the way it is.
If the cost is not much,
over the basic web site,which is probably necessary
in the current publishing age,(if The Bowser Report didn’t
have a website, people would probably be suspicious)maybe it can be kept.
(Perhaps, as a quiet place,
to come and meditate.)in reply to: The Bowser Forum #14595I wish the Bowser Forum
had a section for
higher risk stocks.That way one would
not feel required
to make disclaimers.maybe: Speculative Issues
And More Importantly:
I also especially wish
that the Bowser Forum
had a section to discuss
“bad” or “suspicious” stocks.maybe: The Dungeon
Stocks in The Dungeon
wouldn’t come up on the list
of fresh topics.There are things I’d like
to say and ask, but I don’t like the idea of putting even the
name of the stock in front of
a person in the first place.Also I try to avoid saying
anything directly really bad,
and it might be misunderstood.a dungeon would be really helpful
!and it would not pop up
in the fresh topics!a person would need to seek
it out by going to the dungeonGive up all hope
Of not being misguided
Ye who enter hereFor example, I sold my
shares of SINT, however,
I did not want to risk
freshening up the topic.Negative instructions
are subject to
the causing of confusion.Reduce Infection :)
in reply to: #14594Radio Transmitter Costs
(source same as above)
$138,000 to $377,000
Naturally, my questionably
understanding is a factor.I have included the antenna
with the transmitter,
because I don’t consider it
part of the tower.I have excluded a test equipment item, because I will bundle it
with the other test equipment.The STL (station transmitter link)
could have been included with
the tower expenses. However,
since it seems that one could need
an STL, and not have a tower
(maybe the antenna could be attached to a tall building)
it will be a separate item.the station is where people
make, and pick up, the contentthe transmitter is where that
content is sent outif the station and the transmitter
are in different locations
there must be a pre-transmission
to the transmitterin reply to: #14593Radio Station Construction Costs
(gathered from a 2011 list
of information from the
U.S. Department of Commerce)Radio Transmission Tower
– not the transmitter
– not the station
– not the land (and permits)$100,000 to $620,000
(Quite a bit more than $15,000.)
in reply to: #14592Just for interest from Google:
“How much does it cost
to have a radio station?”“Many stations
get on the air
for under $15,000and can stay on the air
for less than $1,000 per month.”according to the
Prometheus Radio ProjectNot very relevant, I suppose,
however, a first step toward relevance.(I have not listened
to the radio in about
10 years.)(Someone mentioned that
my TV won’t work without
a converter.)(Of course, the converter
probably won’t work, because
I never plug the television
into the electric.)If a gap between $15,000 and
$50,000,000 can be filled,
it is worth taking note of.I suspect it is Show Business.
in reply to: #14591Is there a major
physical component
to the properties
involved?For example, does something
like the Chrysler Building
go along with the stations?I suppose the Chrysler Building would of course be more expensive,
the question is, is the larger
portion of the value tangible?Or the intangibles of a stations programming and branding?
in reply to: #14589Wow.
Do they have any plans
for that $96,500,000?That’s a lot of money.
in reply to: Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) #14586It sounds like
you might be sympathetic
to the famous question
and answer of Samuel Clemens:Do you know what
a gold mine is?A hole in the ground
with a liar on top.Samuel Clemens
is also known as Mark Twain.in reply to: Sell Recommendation/Category Changes (Sep. '13) #14583perhaps
the ability
to engage into investment
in bubble frothtends also to be
the inability
to disengage from investment
in bubble froth(even if they had set a stop loss,
they well may have bought back in:at a much much lower price
with many many more shares
and ended up with
the same same same loss)in reply to: Sell Recommendation/Category Changes (Sep. '13) #14581I have never used a stop order.
(that tells you about my trading
naivety).I always thought erroneously
processed orders were simply
undone.I mean, if I put in an order to
buy 100 shares of a stock, and
the broker bought 1,000,000 shares,
they couldn’t stop me from laughing
or get me to pay, even if they put me
in the electric chair. -
AuthorPosts
